Wow, so incredibly wrong an almost all counts. Concrete currently is the literal opposite of a carbon sink and this will not change anytime soon. Trains eithe

Wow, so incredibly wrong an almost all counts. Concrete currently is the literal opposite of a carbon sink and this will not change anytime soon. Trains either don't have any of the issues or have them at an incredibly low level. So low that comparing it to car infrastructure its utterly ridiculous to even discuss them. > That means more cars, That makes literally 0 sense. Like actually 0. Cars are the single most inefficient way of transport both in terms of space and energy. Literally anytime you have access to cars you could use the same space for MUCH MUCH more access for buses, metros, trains, bikes or literally anything else. > high density housing near offices Yeah and where are all those cars gone be parked? I guess its either in parking lots, making it low density. Or you have to build hugely expensive underground parking garages. And if you go underground, that money would be better invested in something else.