4 ms·
That is the point that gp is making. Many has no definition and many (see what I did there?) disagree about where it’s appropriate.
by Godel_unicode 4y ago
That is the point that gp is making. Many has no definition and many (see what I did there?) disagree about where it’s appropriate.
- jefftk 4y agoI don't think it's even technically true in the lightning case
- Godel_unicode 4y agoWe’ve achieved recursion. Edit: how can something be “technically” true if the word has no definition?