3 ms·
I see a lot of skepticism like this on hackernews. People constantly downplaying how impressive this technology is. It's great to be critical. But most of the c
by famahar 4y ago
I see a lot of skepticism like this on hackernews. People constantly downplaying how impressive this technology is. It's great to be critical. But most of the criticism is too stuck in the present. If it's already as good as many stackoverflow answers, what kind of potential will we see in 1 year, 3 years, a decade. This is massive paradigm shift in the way we program and this conversation thread will be look outdated in a year. So much of the tedium of programming has been eliminated in my day to day. I actually have ideas I pursue now that I know so much friction in the setup process is gone and I won't be severely blocked by bugs.
- sokoloff 4y agoAs a skeptic, this reads like "look how great Google search is at finding stackoverflow answers already; imagine how good it will be in a decade!"
- w4ffl35 4y agoi keep emphasizing this: i don't think we'll be programming any more down the line, i think we'll be engineering with an AI assistant like tony stark. obviously i could be mistaken but it looks like things are heading in that direction.