3 ms·
I could get it down to 10 with the `:compression` option on[1] for hello world. Perhaps this is the option you use? The compression didn't hurt the run time muc
by djha-skin 4y ago
I could get it down to 10 with the `:compression` option on[1] for hello world. Perhaps this is the option you use? The compression didn't hurt the run time much as I recall. It's the reason why I'm still okay with common lisp for this use case.
1: http://www.sbcl.org/manual/#Function-sb_002dext-save_002dlisp_002dand_002ddie http://www.sbcl.org/manual/#Function-sb_002dext-save_002dlis...
- vindarel 4y agoabsolutely, I use SBCL compression (following this recipe: https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/scripting.html#building-a-smaller-binary-with-sbcls-core-compression https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/scripting.html#bu... that boils down to save-lisp-and-die ultimately). Start-up times are still below the 50ms for me.