We'll I suppose we are somewhat at an impasse. I Believe you understand why it is prudent for the judicial branch to refrain from prosecuting key figures from

We'll I suppose we are somewhat at an impasse. I Believe you understand why it is prudent for the judicial branch to refrain from prosecuting key figures from both political parties if the crime committed is just a minor technicality such as not paying a parking ticket or accidentally using non-secure lines of comms. I think we disagree on whether what Trump is rumoured to be charged on falls under the category of "reasonable to refrain from prosecuting". I think this is a politically biased DA, going out of his way to use a technicality to charge Trump. In my opinion, this is way outside of what is acceptable. If the rumours are true there is no major nor minor crime committed here, this is at best a technicality and will likely be thrown out. Besides my opinions on the specific case, I think we also disagree on how much leeway these key political figures and officials should be given before the justice department gets involved. I personally believe we should give much more affordances. I despise the modern idea of the "civil servant". Its a sort of neutering of what should be very revered roles. Everything from the laughable law salaries which are earned by 20 something kids in silicon valley or wall street. To little things like the secret service being able to veto the president on what he/she wants do etc. It just seems so unamerican to me. In a very short timeframe, we have lost so much of the reverence and weight given to these roles. Anyways, I can go on a very long tangent here, so I'll stop myself.