4 ms·
I don't share the enthusaism since it probably means humans won't be looking at code much anymore, at least not as a paid job.
by weatherlite 4y ago
I don't share the enthusaism since it probably means humans won't be looking at code much anymore, at least not as a paid job.
- reidjs 4y agoThe goal shouldn’t be to code, but to create useful software.
- int_19h 4y agoThe real concern is that code will become too incomprehensible to be debugged by most humans before we solve hallucinations etc (if they even are solvable) leading to bugs.
- chaxor 4y agoI am starting to think of this more in the sense that 'not many people write in assembly anymore' or 'some people write C - sure - but writing in Nim can be a nicer experience and can take care of some of the details for me' and it has been helpful for me to come to terms with the direction things are moving. Granted, this is a big step to higher level "programming" (and those quotes are now bigger than ever) but, as pointed out, these LLMs are even better when you know how to use the linguistic interface like a senior dev rather than a person off the street. Effectively, now devs can now work to make decisions closer to the C-suite by framing the problem and constraints, and spend less time on the frustrating errors while developing.