So I re-read what you have said back there as a confirmation. What I see is that you keep saying that human can understand, but AI can't, no matter how hard AI

So I re-read what you have said back there as a confirmation. What I see is that you keep saying that human can understand, but AI can't, no matter how hard AI tries. Then you purpose that AI will fake the answer, etc, this shows that AI do not understand. Me interacting with ChatGPT, what I saw is that the AI system clearly understand to a certain extent that with a rough instruction, it can write absolutely accurate scientific research code. And my expertise is so narrow that if you google the topic, the only material you can find is my blog. And why I can tell ChatGPT understand stuff, is that without my rough instruction, ChatGPT can only write totally wrong non-executable and unoptimized code. Clearly ChatGPT isn't copy and paste the training set, and is able to understand what is what, even cleverer than most undergraduate human (because not even average student can understand such instruction and write that code in one pass). My rough instruction (example): write me a python code to compute the interaction between two elements. AB = I, BC=J, DE=L, and you know the rest. Remind that you can use c2=a2+b2 to speed up. ChatGPT just naild it. Automatically extrapolating the function with its physics knowledge basis. So I basically don't know what you are talking about "AI do not understand xxx". What you are assuming, has no ground.