> Software which is 20% bugs is software you can’t rely on. No one is saying to take the output and immediately ship it. It still needs to be finished and test

> Software which is 20% bugs is software you can’t rely on. No one is saying to take the output and immediately ship it. It still needs to be finished and tested. What's important is what is ultimately delivered; less important is what steps brought you to that point. That said I suspect good testing will become more highly-valued as AI use increases. Maybe there's a form of TDD that can develop, with the human mostly writing tests and AI prompts?