4 ms·
This is known as the orthogonality thesis -- goals are orthogonal to intelligence. Intelligence is the ability to plan and act to achieve your goals, whatever
by NumberWangMan 4y ago
This is known as the orthogonality thesis -- goals are orthogonal to intelligence. Intelligence is the ability to plan and act to achieve your goals, whatever they are. A stupid person can have a goal of helping others, and so can the smartest person on earth -- it's just that one is better. Likewise, a stupid person can have a goal of becoming wealthy, and so can a smart person. The smart person is Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates.
There are very smart people who put all their intelligence into collecting stamps, or making art, or acquiring heroin, or getting laid, or killing people with their bare hands or doing whatever they want to do. They want to do it because they want to. The goal is not smart or stupid, it just is. It may be different from your goal, and hard to understand. Now consider that an AI is not even human. Is it that much of a stretch to imagine that it has a goal as alien, or more, than the weirdest human goal you can think of?
*edit - as in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEUO6pjwFOo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEUO6pjwFOo
- nl 4y agoI think that's a subtly different thing. The OPs claim was more or less the paperclip maximizer problem. I contend that a super intelligence given a specific goal by humans would take the context of humans into account and avoid harm because that's the intelligent thing to do - by definition. The orthogonal thesis is about the separation of intelligence from goals. My attitude to that is that a AI might not actually have goals except when requested to do something.
- NumberWangMan 4y agoHmm, why would you say that avoiding harm is the intelligent thing to do, by definition?
- nl 4y agoDo you have a better definition?
- bigtex88 4y agoFantastic explanation!