3 ms·
Yeah, that makes more sense. I just wanted to point out that taste isn't just the input but also the experience of that input. Then you could also argue that r
by Jensson 4y ago
Yeah, that makes more sense. I just wanted to point out that taste isn't just the input but also the experience of that input.
Then you could also argue that replicating human feelings or taste isn't very important, and it isn't really except if you want it to understand humans. I think it will be hard to understand humans well without also being able to predict their feelings or taste, we humans have that built in but a computer would need data to predict it.
- akasakahakada 4y agoSounds like we are converging to a point that taste science is the next doable project in deep learning. Find something that can be measured. For example measure the amount of sweat of the person eating spicy food. The blood flood rate in the surface of skin. We can know roughly how the person react to spiciness. And than maybe do some clustering, changing the amount of spiciness, draw some regression curve, damn this is exciting!