4 ms·
> We don't need "watchdogs" "protecting" us from stuff we want to do ourselves. I fully agree. But do Europeans in general? Where I am (Sweden) the whole point
by bjornsing 4y ago
> We don't need "watchdogs" "protecting" us from stuff we want to do ourselves.
I fully agree. But do Europeans in general? Where I am (Sweden) the whole point of politics seems to be to “protect” us from ourselves.
- baxtr 4y agoThat's actually the sad message being conveyed by this, right? "You are so dumb, you need to be protected by the state doing stupid things with your data."
- SanderNL 4y agoAnd I get it and usually agree. Some things are dangerous, like toxic materials I don't know about and cannot know about. I expect some agency to protect me, because in this domain I am too stupid. Oh wait.. the whole world is not a developer. I can definitely see how some people need protection here. Even developers are inputting sensitive code and info about their work. Weird times.
- bjornsing 4y agoThe difference is that no reasonable person wants to eat poison, but it’s completely rational to want to use OpenAI’s models on the terms they are offered.
- SanderNL 4y agoTrue, but my point was directed towards toxins I cannot know about. Chemicals added to food and medicines and such. There is loads I - as a layperson - cannot know about safety. My guess is the same is true for "internet stuff". Something we are intimitately aware of, but we are a minority (and we still mess up).
- perryizgr8 4y ago> Some things are dangerous, like toxic materials I don't know about and cannot know about. You don't need regulation for companies to tell you that a product contains a harmful substance. You just need a functioning legal system.