3 ms·
1. The FEC/DOJ elected not to pursue the case in 2018. 2. Cohen's attorneys produced a letter saying Cohen was not reimbursed for the $130K 3. Stormy Daniels
by Blackstrat 4y ago
1. The FEC/DOJ elected not to pursue the case in 2018.
2. Cohen's attorneys produced a letter saying Cohen was not reimbursed for the $130K
3. Stormy Daniels attorneys produced a letter denying that an affair ever occurred.
4. North Carolina failed to convict John Edwards in 2012 of a similar charge, though with actual campaign funds.
5. Bill Clinton settled Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit in 1998, while a president for $850K.
6. Law professors from Turley, Desrchowitz, both liberals, have stated there's no case here.
7. Bragg himself had previously declined to pursue these charges.
8. Bragg routinely does not pursue charges against major crimes.
9. Hillary Clinton, Joe & Hunter Biden and a host of other shady political figures have not been indicted and in some cases, not even investigated for far more serious offenses.
10. This confirms in the mind of Trump supporters as well as to the average man on the street that there are two systems of justice, one for the left and one for the rest.
11. This will not end well for Bragg nor the country. It's bound to ignite a response from Republican AGs in some states.
Welcome to the mess created by the democrat party and there Big Tech/media axis.
- Blackstrat 4y agoI find it humorous how a simple list of factual statements can be down voted by some people here.
- gaganyaan 4y agoYou're spreading misinformation, that's why. One easy google search away: https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-stormy-daniels-2018-statement-denial-trump-affair-066388509688 https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-stormy-daniels-2018-st... > AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. The signed statement with the denial was publicly released on Jan. 30, 2018. Not long after, Daniels recanted the statement and said that an affair had occurred. She said her denials were due to a non-disclosure agreement and that she signed the statement because parties involved “made it sound like I had no choice.” And yes, misinformation includes statements that are technically true by themselves, but intentionally leave out crucial details to create a narrative.
- Blackstrat 4y agoSpare me AP fact checkers. Folks here need to be far more skeptical of “authorities”. It doesn’t matter if she recanted. It is a factual statement that her law firm released the letter. Nor are any of the others inaccurate. As I said, hating Trump is one thing. Corrupting the system to harass political opponents is another.
- gaganyaan 4y agoAgain, cherry-picking facts to push your favored narrative is misinformation. It does matter that you conveniently forgot/left out/whatever that she recanted. You were downvoted because people don't feel like wasting time dealing with bullshit. Please stop doing that, or at least stop whining about it.