5 ms·
Passive “fail safe” designs have been around for quite a while, like the GE ESBWR, which is a Gen III reactor. This[1] data sheet is from 2011. Newer reactors,
by eddyg 4y ago
Passive “fail safe” designs have been around for quite a while, like the GE ESBWR, which is a Gen III reactor. This[1] data sheet is from 2011.
Newer reactors, like the pool-type, metal-fueled, small modular Sodium Fast Reactor [2] are significantly more efficient, are air-cooled, automatically shutdown without human, electronic or mechanical intervention, and by using electro-metallurgical separation, can recycle up to 96 percent of the fissionable material.
[1] https://nuclear.gepower.com/content/dam/gepower-nuclear/global/en_US/documents/product-fact-sheets/ESBWR%20Passive%20Safety%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf https://nuclear.gepower.com/content/dam/gepower-nuclear/glob...
[2] https://nuclear.gepower.com/build-a-plant/products/nuclear-power-plants-overview/prism1 https://nuclear.gepower.com/build-a-plant/products/nuclear-p...
- bottlepalm 4y agoFail safe designs have been around for decades, but they never built them. At this point it doesn't matter. We have 400 non-fail-safe reactors out there. Either shut them down, or replace them with fail safe ones. The fact fail safe designs 'exist' isn't an argument for continuing to operate the ones we have. Or building more of those non-fail-safe designs which is what's currently happening around the world right now.