2 ms·
Yes, the scientific community is in agreement about the overstated risk of these incidents.
by illiarian 4y ago
Yes, the scientific community is in agreement about the overstated risk of these incidents.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoThat wasn't your statement. It's real weird how any pro nuclear argument always seems to be followed up by this exact same slimy deflection tactic and a never ending stream of lies.
- illiarian 4y agoThis is my statement: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35383560 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35383560 This applies to the whole fearmongering about nuclear energy with actual slimy tactics.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoImplying that the evacuation was unnecessary. Either you have no idea what short lived fission prpducts are or you're actively lying.
- illiarian 4y ago> Implying that the evacuation was unnecessary. Implying that overall dangers spouted by fearmongers are overrated given the context of the discussion.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoAgain, the straw man you fell back to was not your initial statement.
- illiarian 4y agoAgain, whatever you imagine I implied, said, or thought, has nothing to do with what I actually said or thought.
- Schroedingersat 4y agoYou said the evacuations were unnecessary and killed people. Leaving a burning building doesn't kill people even if some die in the attempt. You then backed up immediately with unrelated nonsense when challenged.