3 ms·
The solution is either to punish them all or none at all? That doesn't help, at all, to bring some kind of justice. Or would it be the case that given it's a se
by piva00 4y ago
The solution is either to punish them all or none at all? That doesn't help, at all, to bring some kind of justice. Or would it be the case that given it's a sea of malfeasance and it's impossible to prosecute all of them to simply give up on the law and let it be a free-for-all?
Such an odd take.
- throwaway69123 4y agoIt’s not an odd take, in the context of what op is saying is that in has the overt appearance of bias and weaponisation of the legal system against your political opponents. This is the sort of thing Putin did to Nevsky.
- brigandish 4y agoOdd if you make a false dilemma, yes, but I wasn't doing that.
- FpUser 4y agoThe solution is to indict both. Otherwise you do not have "some kind of justice". You are perverting justice system turning it into weapon. And that "impossible to prosecute all" is BS. We are talking couple of people here.
- sanderjd 4y agoIt's normal in our legal system to have a scale of punishment based on the scale of lawbreaking. We don't know enough here to know whether the laws broken in the two cases are of the same scale. Some things are punished with minor fines and others are major fines and possible jail time. The details of the case determine which.