3 ms·
Sad thing is that some consequences are only seen after a decade, like cancer incidence in a population. A similar thing happened in East Palestine derail, mor
by ainiriand 4y ago
Sad thing is that some consequences are only seen after a decade, like cancer incidence in a population.
A similar thing happened in East Palestine derail, mortality is 0 by the accident itself and the long-term consequences are ignored. I guess you cannot produce an argument in favor of just not maintaining rail tracks just because nobody dies from those accidents...
But I guess all of that tends to be forgotten by the media.
- fomine3 4y agoSo let's see the result after a decade ago. https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2020_2021_2.html https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2020_2021_2....
- illiarian 4y ago> But I guess all of that tends to be forgotten by the media. But not by scientific community. Because what you are parroting is exactly what the media is saying. 30 years after Chernobyl https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899336/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4899336/ Most affected are the crews on site. Even people in the evacuation zone "received low radiation doses equivalent to approximately one whole-body computed tomography (CT) scan". The rest of Europe? "in Europe number almost 600 million people, with radiation exposure doses comparable to one annual background radiation dose"