3 ms·
Just check yourself. Canonical and Mozilla spent a lot of time optimizing snaps and firefox inside specifically. The last time I run tests was about two months
by selivanovp 4y ago
Just check yourself. Canonical and Mozilla spent a lot of time optimizing snaps and firefox inside specifically. The last time I run tests was about two months ago and snapped ff performed better than flatpak and deb versions. The main reason for that is more optimal compilation flags they were able to use in a snapped environment.
- mixmastamyk 4y agoNot able to because my main machine is Mint now. But, even on the Ubuntu box, running the deb version is not (generally) possible any more? Also, I see no reason a compilation flags could be used inside a snap but not out of it, other than a policy choice. Finally, what about every other program that uses snaps? This doesn't solve any of the other poor design issues. Like I said, I used Windows for years and ad-hoc is how software is installed there. But even on Windows, installing a program doesn't involve bullshit like spamming Explorer with disk images.