5 ms·
Zip.js only has a .069% size advantage over zip 3.0 given your numbers (4,551,020 bytes & 4,547,885 bytes respectively). Your calculation of 6.8% better than z
by halter73 15y ago
Zip.js only has a .069% size advantage over zip 3.0 given your numbers (4,551,020 bytes & 4,547,885 bytes respectively).
Your calculation of 6.8% better than zip just seemed too impressive.
- bradleyland 15y agoSorry, was off by a factor of 100. Showing the math: zip = 4,551,020 zipjs = 4,547,885 diff = zip - zipjs => 3,135 bytes pctng_diff = diff/zip × 100 => 0.0688856564%