Potentially angering millions of people is not a compelling reason to not pursue criminals through your legal system, of course. > He literally won half the co

Potentially angering millions of people is not a compelling reason to not pursue criminals through your legal system, of course. > He literally won half the country ... Well that's not true, no matter how you slice it, or which election you look at. In neither did he win more than 50% of the vote (2016 it was 46.1% of voters, compared to 48.2% who voted for Hillary - and in 2020 it was 46.8%, compared to the 51.3% for Joe). And while that sounds tantalisingly close enough to half, it overlooks the fact that in those two elections, respectively, only 59% and then 70% of eligible voters (or 54% and 55% of age-and-citizenship-eligible-but-not-registered) actually voted. So that means that you're looking at less than half of roughly 2/3's of the voting population -- a demographic that in turn is only around 3/4 of 'the country'. He literally, therefore, won about 20% of US citizens, or 25% of eligible voters. > ... his rallies ALWAYS have huge turnsouts. That's neither true or compelling. Garry Glitter and Elvis used to have huge crowds.