The incongruity of the Pope wearing a puffy jacket is the entire point of the discussion. So, you can't use that as a supporting argument for what you claim is

The incongruity of the Pope wearing a puffy jacket is the entire point of the discussion. So, you can't use that as a supporting argument for what you claim is "obviously" wrong about this picture. The obviousness claim for why the Pope can't possibly actually be wearing a puffy jacket has to be supported by other evidence that is "obvious". And I'm just not seeing the other things about this picture that are "obviously" wrong. And you don't seem to be doing a great job of explaining what else you see is "obviously" wrong, even if you are seeing it. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that you see see this as being "obviously" wrong, beyond the very subject of the picture. But can you help us see what you see?