I understand this is a revised case, with a new legal theory. Public opinion matters, the case has to be sufficient enough to go after a leading candidate for p

I understand this is a revised case, with a new legal theory. Public opinion matters, the case has to be sufficient enough to go after a leading candidate for president. so lots of questions like this will come up: What does the state of NY have anything to do with enforcing federal election laws? How is paying hush money a crime, when it hasn't been before? How can it be an illegal Campaign contribution, when Trump was financing his own campaign? 7 year old case, how isn't this past statue of limitations? The State's witness is a self-confessed liar, how can his testimony be sufficient.