They had better have some pretty solid evidence aside from his testimony. Building a case around the word of a man convicted of perjury, especially one with a p

They had better have some pretty solid evidence aside from his testimony. Building a case around the word of a man convicted of perjury, especially one with a public hatred of the defendant, seems like a profoundly stupid thing to do. I'll be waiting with my popcorn, because one way or another, this is gonna be good.