4 ms·
> With something completely unrelated? That's a concerning viewpoint. I guess it would be concerning if you commit so many crimes that nobody knew which one yo
by mcphage 4y ago
> With something completely unrelated? That's a concerning viewpoint.
I guess it would be concerning if you commit so many crimes that nobody knew which one you'd actually be charged with first.
Me, I just try to not do that.
- BuyMyBitcoins 4y ago>”Me, I just try to not do that.” A well meaning sentiment but we all break the law on a daily basis. The amount of laws in the US Code is staggering and if a motivated DA wants to charge someone of a crime, they’ll find a way. Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent by Harvey Silvergate is a perfect primer on this subject. From what I understand, this indictment is about accounting and how a payment was classified. Not that the payment itself was illegal, or that it was some bombshell. Some argue it was a legal expense, some argue it should have been a campaign expenditure. It could go either way.
- mcphage 4y ago> A well meaning sentiment but we all break the law on a daily basis. > Some argue it was a legal expense, some argue it should have been a campaign expenditure. Whomst among us has never bought the silence of a porn star using political campaign funds?