2 ms·
>only difference today is that all information is faster. This is exactly the point being made (although I’m not sure I am completely convinced). The analogy c
by bumby 4y ago
>only difference today is that all information is faster.
This is exactly the point being made (although I’m not sure I am completely convinced). The analogy could be “people have always killed each other. Nuclear weapons just make it faster to kill lots of people. Hence there no need to ban nuclear weapons.” The idea being there is a tipping point where the scalability of technology outpaces our biologically evolved innate sense to control it.
I agree with #1 but only in some domains. You can see it with guessing the weight of a bull at a fair or the number of jelly beans in a jar. But there’s other examples where it breaks down. In economics we have bubbles that are destructive when corrected. I’m not sure we want that short term extreme volatility in something like governance.
- pclmulqdq 4y agoThe alternative to that short-term volatility is long-term tyranny. No thank you. I'll take the volatility.
- bumby 4y agoI think that’s a false dichotomy and not particularly helpful. The question is more about what level of volatility can be tolerate while still maintaining a stable society.