The original claim makes no sense to me, nor does your complaint; `git revert` specifically creates new history rather than trying to do something rebase-like a

The original claim makes no sense to me, nor does your complaint; `git revert` specifically creates new history rather than trying to do something rebase-like and change history/force push. That's why it's easy to revert the revert. Yes, I highly recommend git revert. So if the author really means "git revert with a nicer user interface" then by all means have at it, although I don't see what anybody is disagreeing on.