[1] gives a jist as well. What I meant to say was that: Acc to The Information article the engineer raised concerns because it appeared to him (article wording

[1] gives a jist as well. What I meant to say was that: Acc to The Information article the engineer raised concerns because it appeared to him (article wording) Bard team was using (and heavily reliant on) ShareGPT for Bard training. The engineer wasnt working on Bard and presumably someone told him or somehow he got the impression that Bard team was reliant on ShareGPT. At the time he was at Google. Then, when he raised concerns to Sundar Pichai, Bard team stopped doing it and also scrapped any traces of ShareGPT data. So, the headline is false and Bard (again presumably) is not trained on any of ShareGPT data. [1]: https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/29/23662621/google-bard-chatgpt-sharegpt-training-denies https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/29/23662621/google-bard-chat...