4 ms·
The reason you will struggle to find data like that is that there is no "non-smoker" group. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674187/ https://www.nc
by elif 4y ago
The reason you will struggle to find data like that is that there is no "non-smoker" group. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4674187/
BPA is in every person, and fetal and childhood exposure is the most critical period, and cancers don't develop until later in life.
- dragontamer 4y ago> BPA is in every person I severely doubt that. Different people have different habits. I go to the grocery store. I can look at my neighbors food choices and see that some people buy cans, other people buy frozen. Any hypothetical BPA-issue will affect the canned people more, and the frozen-buyers less.
- dragontamer 4y ago> Commercial production of BPA began in the United States in 1957 and then in Europe a year later A quote from the article you posted. This suggests that older people born before 1957 should have different properties compared to people born after that year, especially if you are alleging that babies are especially sensitive to this plastic. I know my Grandma is older than 1957. There's probably plenty of people who can participate in such a study of the anti-BPA crowd cared.
- elif 4y agoYou'll find that's consistent with the data, but also that cancer diagnosis techniques have improved, confounding results. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362167164/figure/fig2/AS:1180474814808086@1658458536881/Age-specific-breast-cancer-incidence-rate-from-1997-to-2016-and-projections-from-2017-to.png https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362167164/figure/fi...