3 ms·
Ah, you're expecting the law to make sense? Telephone conversations, or the conversation in a meeting, are not "expected" to be recorded. Yes, they could be, b
by AlbertCory 4y ago
Ah, you're expecting the law to make sense?
Telephone conversations, or the conversation in a meeting, are not "expected" to be recorded. Yes, they could be, but they're not, so it doesn't matter. Your logical extensions are kinda irrelevant.
A chat is recorded, on the server. It isn't deleted after people receive it. Google, and lots of companies, interpret "off the record" to mean that it's deleted after a period.
- singleshot_ 4y agoCitation for any of this?
- revelio 4y agoThe law should make sense, and your argument is exactly the same as the one Google used with chats, there isn't any difference. It could easily be argued that phone calls are "recorded" by the VOIP systems. Especially because off the record means there was no 24 hour retention period and the messages were never recorded to begin with. You're mixing up the default behaviour of "history on" (24 hour retention) with "history off" (no retention.