3 ms·
That's just because they made accounts and so agreed to the terms right? From your link: >These rulings suggest that courts are much more comfortable restrict
by sebzim4500 4y ago
That's just because they made accounts and so agreed to the terms right?
From your link:
>These rulings suggest that courts are much more comfortable restricting scraping activity where the parties have agreed by contract (whether directly or through agents) not to scrape. But courts remain wary of applying the CFAA and the potential criminal consequences it carries to scraping. The apparent exception is when a company engages in a pattern of intentionally creating fake accounts to collect logged-in data.
- verdverm 4y agoNo, the case did not decide anything, no precedent was set. The point is that you cannot use this case to argue that you can scrape public data free of consequence