3 ms·
> How would that be fair? I'm not sure how you could argue it wouldn't be fair. The US would only be treating Chinese companies like China treats US companies.
by CogitoCogito 4y ago
> How would that be fair?
I'm not sure how you could argue it wouldn't be fair. The US would only be treating Chinese companies like China treats US companies.
> Wouldn't giving American consumers access to what they want be the fairest of all?
No? Not unless China did likewise. What is your definition of fairness?
> Just because there's a wrong in China with their censorship, doesn't mean that adding another wrong in the US make a right.
How is "wrong" for the US to treat Chinese companies the way US companies are treated in China? These are simply trade agreements. Besides if you think what China is doing is wrong, then I hope you'd understand that the US ignoring it _enables_ that wrong.
By your logic, the US shouldn't ban products produced by slave labor. Do you mean to make that argument? If not, what would be different there?
- eru 4y ago> By your logic, the US shouldn't ban products produced by slave labor. Do you mean to make that argument? If not, what would be different there? I'm not quite sure that's the same? As long as the US bans products produced by slave labour regardless of country of origin, there's no problem here. But in any case: yes, I can bite the bullet on that one, the US doesn't necessarily need to ban products produced by slave labour.