4 ms·
Your argument is companies should be allowed to do anything they like, because there will be another country where they can abuse with impunity?
by CJefferson 4y ago
Your argument is companies should be allowed to do anything they like, because there will be another country where they can abuse with impunity?
- nickthegreek 4y agoI think the argument is that no harm has actually been shown and there is no legal reason to have one of the fastest growing companies hamstrung while Big Tech gets it's shit together.
- sieabahlpark 4y ago[dead]
- eggsmediumrare 4y ago[flagged]
- mmastrac 4y agoYour argument is so ridiculous and easy to disprove with even a moment's Google search that I wonder why you made it.
- eggsmediumrare 4y agoThere was a very thorough understanding of the theoretical harm, as there is with AI. Harm from the Trinity test was not shown until after Japan, again having parallels with AI considering we don't yet know the long-term harms that may occur due to existing, less powerful models. Would you mind sharing your contention instead of just telling me you googled something? My argument is also pretty clearly not that pedantic. I'm saying there was obviously going to be harm by the detonation of a nuclear weapon, but it wasn't technically shown until it was actually detonated. I'm saying the same thing is true of AI. You can disagree, but it's not _that_ ridiculous to compare the two.
- tiagod 4y agoBad example. Plenty of harm during tests.
- FrenchDevRemote 4y agoSEO spam and social media fake content are already pretty common, so there is definitely at least some harm
- fogoflove 4y agoI feel as if there needs to be data that demonstrates an explosion of SEO spam and social media fake content. People have been doing those things since we figured out we could -- LLMs are just exponentially better at it. If we're going to start using excuses for LLMs to get clipped, I think we should focus on the core of the problem, not the fact LLMs can enhance it.
- boringuser2 4y agoIt's a terrible argument. The harm is transparent and greatly eclipses most other threats to cybersecurity.
- nickthegreek 4y agoPlease list the harm that has been done. I do not see it as transparent.
- boringuser2 4y agoIf someone puts a gun to your head, what harm has been done? Well, the potential harm is only deniable by the biggest of shills, but, technically, the only harm is psychological.
- nickthegreek 4y agoEverything and I really do mean everything has potential harm. Is your position that OpenAI should have to suspend their business over this?
- boringuser2 4y agoDo you really see commensurate potential harm between an extreme scenario and a mundane one? The development of AGI is an extreme, extreme scenario.
- nickthegreek 4y agoIs your position that OpenAI should have to suspend their business over this?
- boringuser2 4y agoThese goalposts keep evolving.
- zvonimirs 4y agoDefinitely not - companies should be regulated but stopping the future releases is not possible when you have tech powerful as GPT.
- SuoDuanDao 4y agosounds like a sound argument, nonviolence isn't ignoring violence; You don't win a knife fight by declaring it a spirited debate; Darwin had a point; etc.
- tomjen3 4y agoWhere anything they like means publishing a text prediction engine that is pretty good?