What is counterintuitive in OPs statement if we're talking about eating meat? > Rape feels good and no amount of preaching is changing that. Has similarly been

What is counterintuitive in OPs statement if we're talking about eating meat? > Rape feels good and no amount of preaching is changing that. Has similarly been part of human culture for time immemorial. > [Meat] is tasty and no amount of your religious preaching is going to change that. There is no ambiguity here? A rapist doesn't regard the feelings of their victims. Someone who eats an animal doesn't regard the feelings of that animal. In both cases, it's clear who enjoys that situation and who suffers for it.