3 ms·
If their motive wasn't the bounty, and it is just an unexpected bonus, why complain about it being too small?
by jsnell 4y ago
If their motive wasn't the bounty, and it is just an unexpected bonus, why complain about it being too small?
- joosters 4y agoThe researchers didn't complain about the bounty, AFAIK.
- jsnell 4y agoI know. That's the entire point. It is just HN complaining on their behalf, unsolicited.
- inferiorhuman 4y agoSo. What. $40,000 is something that a senior SDE could pay out themselves without flinching. A trillion dollar company like MSFT should do better than that for something so severe. Put another way: just because the researchers didn't (publicly) complain doesn't put MSFT in the right here. There are more than a few kernel developers who didn't raise hell about Linus' abusive behavior. Yet even Linus himself realized his behavior had to change.
- ethanwillis 4y agoIt's almost as if HN is a site where we discuss things instead of just passively consuming information. In either case only paying $40,000 for disclosing an exploit like this sends a clear message from Microsoft. They don't take their user's security seriously. And it also incentivizes certain outcomes -- They're cheap and less moral actors who are only motivated by the finanical reward won't bother to engage with Microsoft. Use Microsoft products at your own peril.