3 ms·
I personally do not see an issue with 3 office day mandate. Your job probably isn't so solitary that you don't need other people at all and at the office you ge
by nextlevelwizard 4y ago
I personally do not see an issue with 3 office day mandate. Your job probably isn't so solitary that you don't need other people at all and at the office you get a lot of micro interactions that you wouldn't get otherwise. Just think when was the last time you randomly ran into a guy from the next department while getting coffee and you were just chit-chatting and one of you brought up a topic that helped the other?
Yes, that doesn't happen daily to every one, but it happens quite often when you have 100+ people under same roof. You still have 2 days a week you can spend at home.
EDIT: As a bit tangential question: would you be willing to take a pay cut to keep 100% remote? If not would you be fine with people receiving a "office worker bonus" based on days worked at the office?
- humanrebar 4y agoI want to be paid for the value I provide, not the GPS coordinates of my desk chair. I think it's far from clear that remote workers are always, or even generally, providing less value than in physically present ones. I know I had a lot more time to document and do other kinds of written collaboration, especially across the organization, when I was working more days per week remotely.
- nextlevelwizard 4y ago> I want to be paid for the value I provide, not the GPS coordinates of my desk chair. As per my previous comment people at the office do provide more value.
- dickersnoodle 4y ago[flagged]