3 ms·
Sorry, that's wrong, at least as far as caffeine is concerned, and certainly as far as adverse behavioural effects ("behavioural toxicity") are concerned in hum
by b800h 4y ago
Sorry, that's wrong, at least as far as caffeine is concerned, and certainly as far as adverse behavioural effects ("behavioural toxicity") are concerned in humans.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016420300359#s0065 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S131901642...
- bowsamic 4y agoOh, interesting, thanks. I'm not sure why you're downvoted. What about nicotine?
- b800h 4y agoNo idea on that front. The caffeine one struck a chord because I'm a slow metaboliser, and it can cause me issues with anxiety under the wrong circumstances. It does make me wonder how many cases of anxiety are at least exacerbated by genetic issues with processing caffeine and other stimulants.
- lll-o-lll 4y agoCurse you science! Still, this is just in rats. Rats with their weak rat brains. My superior human brain can easily absorb this caffeine with no ill effects!
- prottog 4y agoThat Kang et al. study was 50mg/kg of caffeine administered three times a day. That would be about a hundred cups a day of coffee for my body weight. Don't they say the dose makes the poison?