4 ms·
A river kinda has access to the real world a little bit. (Referring to the other part of the argument.)
by rdiddly 4y ago
A river kinda has access to the real world a little bit. (Referring to the other part of the argument.)
- michaeltimo 4y agoAnd a LLM-bot can have access to internet which connects it to our real world, at least in many places.
- aws_ls 4y agoAlso it has access to people. It could instruct people to carry out stuff in the real world, on its behalf.
- qup 4y agoAdditionally, commanding minions is a leverage point. It's probably more powerful if it does not embody itself.
- nwsm 4y agoOpenAI's GPT-4 Technical Report [0] includes an anecdote of the AI paying someone on TaskRabbit to solve a CAPTCHA for it. It lied to the gig worker about being a bot, saying that they are actually a human with a vision impairment. [0] https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
- Natfan 4y agoFor reference, this anecdote is on pages 55/56.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- ok_dad 4y agoA more advanced AI sitting in AWS might have access to John Deere’s infrastructure, or maybe Tesla’s, so imagine a day where an AI can store memories, learn from mistakes, and maybe some person tells it to drive some tractors or cars into people on the street. Are you saying this is definitely not possible? If so, what evidence do you have that it’s not?
- tarsinge 4y agoThat makes me think, why not concentrate the effort on regulating the usages instead of regulating the technology itself? Seems not too far fetched to have rules and compliance on how LLM are permitted to be used in critical processes. There is no danger until it's plugged on the wrong system without oversight.
- suoduandao2 4y agosounds like a recipe for ensuring AI is used to entrenche the interests of the powerful.