2 ms·
That would still be around one in ten people unable to remember where they were. Enough that Bush not knowing where he was isn't strong evidence he was connecte
by boomboomsubban 4y ago
That would still be around one in ten people unable to remember where they were. Enough that Bush not knowing where he was isn't strong evidence he was connected.
- eviks 4y agoIt wouldn't. Saying you know, but being wrong on details, is very different from saying you don't know
- boomboomsubban 4y agoIt's possible he had discussed the event since and realized his memory was unclear. That's how my "where were you when you heard about 9/11" goes. I confidently had an answer for decades, but a few years ago discussed it with my father who I remembered telling me, and he doesn't remember it the same way. So now I'm not sure whether either of us remember it correctly.
- eviks 4y agoYour anecdote is fine, but it doesn't resolve the issue with the wrong assessment: nowhere near "one in ten people" had this self-reflective experience you had that led to them declaring since they don't know, that was a reference to a totally different group of people