> And this after they were caught “faking” photos of the moon: This genuinely isn't informative evidence of how the process works. You're not seeing the raw sa

> And this after they were caught “faking” photos of the moon: This genuinely isn't informative evidence of how the process works. You're not seeing the raw samples from the camera, which are going to be very noisy even if you're showing it a white circle. "It's actually the moon" may be a reasonable belief given the noise level.