3 ms·
That doesn't sound complete, are there steps you haven't written out? You've given some true facts about cycles. Why does your observation about Collatz cycles
by justinpombrio 4y ago
That doesn't sound complete, are there steps you haven't written out? You've given some true facts about cycles. Why does your observation about Collatz cycles imply the Collatz conjecture, which is that every sequence is part of a cycle?
- dankearney 4y agoI’m proving that there are no cycles above the trivial cycle with this, and yeah this post is just a quick summary
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- justinpombrio 4y agoIt wasn't enough detail to spot the error in the proof.
- dankearney 4y agoI’m going to polish it up and will share with you, I explained to it eru in more detail