Can't get more functional than scheme :) Sure, per his def of FP, scheme is numbers 1 through 18 on the league table ;-} Other defs: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/78

Can't get more functional than scheme :) Sure, per his def of FP, scheme is numbers 1 through 18 on the league table ;-} Other defs: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7810909/docs/what-does-fp-mean/what-does-fp-mean/html/index.html http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7810909/docs/what-does-fp-mean/what-... http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/16/what-is-a-functional-language/ http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/16/what-is-a-fu... http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2254368/if-java-people-go-to-scala-c-go-to-f-where-do-ruby-people-go-for-functional-n http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2254368/if-java-people-go... I'm not taking sides, i like haskell, scala, clojure just fine, I'm sure I would like racket or CL if i picked them up.