One thing I like about this is that it strikes a good (IMO) balance between: - address common cases with flexibility for domain specific minutiae - explicitly

One thing I like about this is that it strikes a good (IMO) balance between: - address common cases with flexibility for domain specific minutiae - explicitly call out that there are cases where it’s either redundant or insufficient I was also struck by how `type` feels very reminiscent of XML namespace URIs, but it’s great that there’s a SHOULD recommendation that the URIs resolve to something meaningful in resolving problems. Overall it’s not an earth shattering idea, but it seems like a pretty good baseline approach to solving something that’s often either neglected or reinvented.