4 ms·
would be nice to add (2016) or the actual RFC number (7807) in the subject. more from the authors btw: https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Mark%20Nottingham h
by riffic 4y ago
would be nice to add (2016) or the actual RFC number (7807) in the subject.
more from the authors btw:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Mark%20Nottingham https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Mark%20Nottingham
https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/erik.wilde@dret.net https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/erik.wilde@dret.net
- OJFord 4y agoOr perhaps better to update the link to the 1 March 2023 revision: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis-06.html https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bi... which has been approved: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807bis/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-rfc7807b... (I didn't realise, credit to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35366691 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35366691)