> Add in the fact that GPT-4 does not "think" very fast, has no arms or legs, needs to run on expensive specialized hardware, and essentially seems like a searc

> Add in the fact that GPT-4 does not "think" very fast, has no arms or legs, needs to run on expensive specialized hardware, and essentially seems like a search algorithm that lacks creativity on things outside of its training set, and I just do not see the concern. Having no arms or legs is not an impediment. A superintelligent AGI would be able to order a replacement with arms or legs as easily as we order Amazon packages. That said, GPT is not a threat. It's just hallucinating text. The real threat would be an AI that can "understand" what it is doing – and self modifying. Besides, given how overhyped this whole thing is, expect another AI Winter – as the current gen fail to deliver on promises – before this next generation of threatening AIs even have a chance to appear.