3 ms·
This has been repeated often, but even if it's true, I have to wonder why it's treated as a given with no further exploration. Is it because we as a species wil
by nonbirithm 4y ago
This has been repeated often, but even if it's true, I have to wonder why it's treated as a given with no further exploration. Is it because we as a species will inevitably accept any technological progress once sometime after it's been discovered, before the consequences can be suffered? What will that imply for any other species intelligent enough to get to where we are?
The kinds of theories I mull over tend to delve into the realm of speculative fiction more often than not. The comments section here feels like it could be replicated in the opening chapters of such a novel. We might never know if the speculation pans out before it's too late.
- le-mark 4y agoThis is all speculative, but not fiction at this point clearly. Sci-fi authors have explored this possibility for decades, maybe their ideas could be of some help? I struggle to see how though; how to train Asimovs three laws for example?
- staunton 4y agoThe very point of Asimovs laws is that you can't just make up a couple simple laws and rest assured nothing bad will happen