3 ms·
The problem is that the people who kick off an authoritarian government are typically the ones who die first. The revolution eats its own. See the brown shirts,
by all2 4y ago
The problem is that the people who kick off an authoritarian government are typically the ones who die first. The revolution eats its own. See the brown shirts, the multiple rounds of beheadings during the French revolution, the Bolsheviks, and so on. So whoever hopes the government will continue to support them generally hopes in vain. The machine has two goals: continue existing, and expand its power.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> The problem is that the people who kick off an authoritarian government are typically the ones who die first. The revolution eats its own. See the brown shirts, the multiple rounds of beheadings during the French revolution, the Bolsheviks, and so on. But, except for maybe some of those in the French Revolution, those are mostly foot soldiers, or leaders who fell victim to distinct subsequent revolutions, not the people who kicked off the resolution getting eaten by it.
- all2 4y ago> foot soldiers That's who I was referring to in GGP. Generally the masses don't fare well in revolution.