4 ms·
As a classic VB and C# developer, that was their mistake. VB.NET has no reason to exist. If it was much more backwards compatible with VB Classic it would hav
by wvenable 4y ago
As a classic VB and C# developer, that was their mistake. VB.NET has no reason to exist. If it was much more backwards compatible with VB Classic it would have had a reason to exist -- it would have allowed VB projects (of which there were millions) to migrate over to .NET smoothly.