4 ms·
Theres a fair precedent if you use the clear and present danger doctrine. Not that I agree that it is actually an immediate threat to US national security, but
by boshalfoshal 4y ago
Theres a fair precedent if you use the clear and present danger doctrine.
Not that I agree that it is actually an immediate threat to US national security, but anti-TikTok pundits claim it is and can spin their argument that way. Its not unreasonable following that premise.