4 ms·
> Atleast SBF took the extra step of first funneling money to Alameda and then directing Alameda to send it back to him and then send it to his dad as a tax fre
by pengaru 4y ago
> Atleast SBF took the extra step of first funneling money to Alameda and then directing Alameda to send it back to him and then send it to his dad as a tax free gift.
Isn't this worse for him in the long run if he's found guilty though? Words like "structuring", "posturing", "evasion" come to mind...
- TacticalCoder 4y ago> Words like "structuring" As much as I want to see that scammer and his family rot in jail , as much as I find "structuring" totally unfair. If you set the limit to, say "$1 K / day" and then someone does "$1 K / day, everyday", it's not doing anything wrong. Instead of inventing the concept of "structuring", instead write the actual limits more clearly: "$1 K / day, $10 K / year max" (for example). Then it's clear that the limit is $1 K / day max and that you can only do it up to 10 times a year. For otherwise it's just one of the oh-so-many arbitrary rules invented so that even honest people may be, unknowingly, doing something illegal. Laws against structuring makes me think of this: "The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state". The state should make the law clear or go fuck itself.