5 ms·
Equally arguable: Rape feels good and no amount of preaching is changing that. Has similarly been part of human culture for time immemorial. I still consider i
by 3np 4y ago
Equally arguable: Rape feels good and no amount of preaching is changing that. Has similarly been part of human culture for time immemorial.
I still consider it desirable to reduce the amount of rape to 0, regardless of how important it might feel to rapists.
- PM_me_your_math 4y agoRape feels good for the victim? I was always under the impression that rape is a horrible, terrible, painful, and humiliating atrocity. I've never been a democrat, so maybe that's why I don't have a favorable view of rape and think is feels good for the victim.
- 3np 4y agoSo that's where you end up following that line of thought huh
- fennecfoxy 4y agoThis is incredibly counterintuitive as really what you mean is "rape feels good to a rapist". That's the important part. I feel like the majority of people, if held at gunpoint and forced to rape somebody, would not be comfortable, they would not enjoy it and it would be a scarring, traumatic experience.
- 9dev 4y agoWhat is counterintuitive in OPs statement if we're talking about eating meat? > Rape feels good and no amount of preaching is changing that. Has similarly been part of human culture for time immemorial. > [Meat] is tasty and no amount of your religious preaching is going to change that. There is no ambiguity here? A rapist doesn't regard the feelings of their victims. Someone who eats an animal doesn't regard the feelings of that animal. In both cases, it's clear who enjoys that situation and who suffers for it.