4 ms·
Ah, ok so you are considering the latency rather than the throughput. I was thinking that being able to perform the update within 16.6ms should not be too hard
by amoss 4y ago
Ah, ok so you are considering the latency rather than the throughput. I was thinking that being able to perform the update within 16.6ms should not be too hard - there is a sibling comment about SSD latency but the working set should fit in RAM.
Sure, so there will be latency, maybe 4-5 frames with input lag. But this is normally bearable in a game so I'm guessing that it would work fine for an office app. It would be difficult to remove, but 80ms response time from an application that can always hit its 16.6ms deadline should be workable.
- seba_dos1 4y agoWe're talking about switching between conversations, latency is all that matters :)
- ehaliewicz2 4y agoThis seems like needless pedantry. The computer should be able to easily do it in 16ms or less. Add on the 16ms or whatever of extra latency for the mouse and display, and it's fine.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]